You are currently viewing August 19th Formal Meeting: POST Meeting Report

August 19th Formal Meeting: POST Meeting Report

The August 19, 2026 Formal Board Meeting of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors convened at 9:30 AM in the Supervisors’ Auditorium with all five supervisors present, though Supervisor Steve Gallardo (D5) arrived late.

The meeting ran approximately 2 hours and 24 minutes and covered 173 agenda items spanning zoning, grants, real estate, public health, and infrastructure.

Key takeaway: This was a high-volume, low-dissent procedural session.

The board approved millions in grants and contracts with minimal debate.

Fourteen citizen speakers addressed the board—six on RICO oversight (Items 157-158) and twelve during the Call to the Public, with topics spanning election transparency, mental health care failures, voting accessibility, data center impacts, foreclosure fraud, and library content concerns.

The most substantive engagement came from citizens challenging RICO fund expenditures and demanding accountability for Recorder Justin Heap’s $20 million election budget.

Notable pattern: Debbie Lesko maintained her near-monopoly on motions (100% of recorded motions), and every single vote was unanimous—including contentious RICO authorizations that citizens had just criticized.


Attendance

District Supervisor Status Notes
1 Mark Stewart Present Arrived on time
2 Thomas Galvin Present Arrived on time
3 Kate Brophy McGee Present Chair; led meeting
4 Debbie Lesko Present Vice Chair
5 Steve Gallardo Present Arrived late; participated in votes

Also Present:

  • Juanita Garza, Clerk of the Board
  • Jen Pokorski, County Manager
  • Brooke Worcester, Legal Counsel

Significant Actions

💰 Items 157-158: RICO Expenditure Authority — Citizen Scrutiny Followed by Unanimous Approval

What happened: The board considered two related RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) fund expenditure authority items: quarterly reporting (Item 157) and additional expenditure authority (Item 158). Both items were pulled from the consent agenda for discussion after receiving six speaker cards.

Citizen testimony (detailed below): Three speakers on each item challenged the board’s oversight of RICO funds, citing specific expenditures including $475,000 for software developer services, $353,000 for electronics/camera upgrades, $140,000 for vehicles, and a sheriff’s airplane with $140,000 in maintenance costs. Speakers questioned the four-year backlog in body camera redactions while RICO money funds surveillance technology.

Board response: County Attorney representative Tom Liddy acknowledged that body camera redaction delays were “righteous complaints” and explained that public records requests had “exploded.” Supervisor Stewart noted the challenge of layering Melendrez requirements, body camera redaction, and other demands. Supervisor Gallardo confirmed the board’s role was limited to ensuring expenditures meet statutory definitions—not directing where money goes.

Vote: 5-0 on both items (Lesko moved, unanimous)

Citizen note: The board heard detailed, specific criticisms of RICO spending—then approved the authority unanimously without any amendments or conditions. The message: oversight occurs after the money is spent, not before.


Three items authorized outside counsel and expert witnesses for RICO-related litigation:

  • Item 143: Authorization to retain outside counsel and expert witnesses in litigation matters related to RICO expenditures (C-06-26-020-X-01)
  • Item 144: Similar authorization (C-06-26-021-X-01)
  • Item 145: Similar authorization (C-06-26-022-X-01)

These passed via consent agenda with no discussion.


🌞 Item 75: Mariposa Solar Energy Project — Major Zone Change Approved

Location: Southeast corner of Patterson Road and Litchfield Road (District 5 — Gallardo)

Applicant: Chris Webb / Rose Law Group representing Hanwha QCELLS USA Corp.

What happened: The board approved a zone change from Rural-190 to IND-2 IUPD (Industrial with Industrial Unit Planned Development overlay) for a solar energy facility with Battery Energy Storage System (BESS). The project includes specific conditions limiting uses to solar power generation and ancillary uses until sewer is available.

Planning Commission recommendation: Approved 6-0 (motion by Commissioner Rochwalik D3, seconded by Commissioner Leighton D4)

Key conditions:

  • Minimum 500-foot setback from BESS cabinets to residential dwellings
  • 6-foot chain link perimeter fencing
  • Conceptual engineering review only; full plans required for construction permits
  • Archaeological/historical review required before ground disturbance

Vote: 5-0 (Lesko moved, Gallardo seconded)


Location: 1,320 feet east of NEC of 355th Avenue and McDowell Road, Tonopah area (District 4 — Lesko)

Applicant: Natalie Maikoski / EPS Group, Inc. for Tonopah I-10 & 355 Ave-72 Acre, LLC & JR Investments 10 LLC

What happened: The board approved two related items:

  • Item 77 (CPA260003): Comprehensive Plan Amendment changing land use from Rural Densities (0-1 du/ac) to Industrial on 42.5 acres
  • Item 78 (Z260006): Zone change from Rural-43 to IND-2 IUPD on 72 acres

Planning Commission recommendation: Both approved 6-0 (motion by Commissioner Rochwalik D3, seconded by Commissioner Leighton D4)

Key conditions for zone change:

  • Archaeological/historical review required before ground disturbance
  • Industrial Unit Planned Development (IUPD) overlay limits uses to those acceptable for on-site septic until public sewer available
  • McDowell Road access requires floodplain disturbance compliance
  • Property owners waive claims for diminution in value if approval rescinded for noncompliance

Votes: Both 5-0 (Lesko moved, Stewart seconded)


🛣️ Item 17: Avondale Road De-Annexation — Public Hearing

Location: Miami Avenue from Avondale Boulevard to 111th Avenue (District 5 — Gallardo)

What happened: Following a July 15, 2026 public hearing, the board formally ordered the de-annexation of a portion of Miami Avenue from the City of Avondale back to Maricopa County. The action transfers 0.000619 square miles to County ownership.

Purpose: Completes the required 40-foot right-of-way for the Major Collector roadway. Seven feet of the required right-of-way was within Avondale; the de-annexation allows the County to assume full maintenance responsibility.

Financial note: Saves MCDOT from having to purchase and construct a half-street at this location.

Public hearing requirement: Convened per A.R.S. § 9-471.03; previous hearing held July 15, 2026.

Vote: 5-0 (Lesko moved, Gallardo seconded)


💉 Item 166: Medication Donations for Correctional Health — Novel Pharmaceutical Partnership

What happened: The board approved accepting donated medications from four pharmaceutical companies (Alkermes, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Neurocrine Biosciences) for Correctional Health Services (CHS). The medications include Long-Acting Injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications and oral medications to combat Tardive dyskinesia.

Significance: This creates a pharmaceutical partnership model where drug companies donate medications for incarcerated patients—potentially reducing County costs while raising questions about influence and prescribing patterns.

Contract: C-26-27-001-X-00


📊 Items 157-158: RICO Funds — The Citizen Accountability Challenge

These items deserve expanded treatment due to the substantive citizen engagement:

Item 157: Receive RICO quarterly expenditure reports from County Attorney and Sheriff
Item 158: Approve additional RICO expenditure authority

Citizen speakers on these items:

Speaker Item Key Points
Roger Mabe 157 Authorization before accountability; board should know what’s being authorized before voting, not discover it in quarterly reports months later
Lezly Shepherd 157 Body camera redaction backlog is 4 years; only 4 redaction staff requested in January 2026 budget; questioned why RICO funds can’t address PRR backlog
Lauri Baroni 157 $475K software, $353K electronics, $140K vehicles; sheriff’s airplane with $140K engine replacement; “Include the PRR department, please”
Roger Mabe 158 Late reporting; Clerk’s office was still requesting County Attorney’s April-June reports on August 3; reports transmitted August 13; “A report arriving in time for an agenda is not the same as meaningful oversight”
Lezly Shepherd 158 Reiterated body cam concerns; noted the county attorney’s hyperlinks for RICO reports were “crazy” and hard to navigate
Lauri Baroni 158 “Transparency should occur before authorization, not simply afterwards”; reiterated airplane and PRR concerns

Board’s response: After hearing these concerns, the board approved both items unanimously without amendment.


🏛️ Other Notable Actions

Item Description District Contract
65 Sheriff’s MASH Unit: F-450 truck + animal rescue trailer ($318,416 + $12K annual) C-50-27-020-X-00
68 DHS Phlebotomy/DRE Coordinator grant (+$5K, total $75K) C-50-26-025-X-01
79 Fireplace Retrofit Program with Arizona Asthma Coalition ($8,500) C-85-27-001-X-00
80 EV Charging Infrastructure — UACT Inc. ($84,875) 5 C-85-27-003-X-00
81 EV Charging Infrastructure — Tolleson Union HSD ($861,160) 4,5 C-85-27-004-X-00
101 ARPA Fund Reallocation (net zero; major shifts between departments) All C-18-27-010-X-00
102 ARPA “Cliff” Budget Adjustments ($2.8M+ for positions) All C-18-27-011-X-00
163 Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program ($500K, 3 years) All C-22-27-006-X-00
164 Community Action Program (+$1.4M) All C-22-26-011-X-04

Vote Analysis

Motion Monopoly Pattern

Supervisor Motions Made Percentage
Debbie Lesko 18+ ~100%
Thomas Galvin 1 ~5%
Mark Stewart 0 0%
Kate Brophy McGee 0 0%
Steve Gallardo 0 0%

Debbie Lesko has now maintained 100% motion control across multiple consecutive formal meetings. On the rare occasions when others make motions, they are procedural (Galvin occasionally seconds). This consolidates agenda control in the Vice Chair.

Unanimity Analysis

  • Split votes: 0
  • Unanimous votes: 18+ recorded motions
  • Dissent: None

Every item, including the contested RICO authorizations that citizens had just criticized, passed 5-0.


Citizen Participation

Call to the Public — 12 Speakers

The board received 15 requests to speak during the Call to the Public. Twelve citizens addressed the board on topics spanning election transparency, mental health care failures, voting accessibility, data center impacts, foreclosure fraud, and library content concerns.

Speaker Organization/Affiliation Key Topic
Caitlin Contreras ACLU of Arizona Election transparency; demanded Recorder Heap provide accessible ballot drop-off options, rejected ballot transparency data, and public reporting on ballot processing
Crystal Fox Arizona “Mad Mom” (800 families); psychiatric nurse; ValleyWise employee Mental health system failures; son with untreated schizophrenia killed father after being denied care by MCSO, Aurora, Banner, ValleyWise, Crisis La Frontera, Community Bridges, First Episode, TAROS
Lisa Everett (Not specified) Data centers; shared Pinal County Board of Supervisors video presentation on data center grid connections, urged board to be “knowledgeable” about data center impacts rather than relying on “conspiracy theories”
Twyla Lake Arizona Mad Moms Requested informal meeting with board to collaborate on serious mental illness advocacy, better jail treatment, and homeless outreach; also spoke as disability voter on accessible voting
Juan Mendez State Senator Election infrastructure oversight; demanded five actions: expand drive-through drop boxes, guarantee polling site neutrality, demand signature verification demographics, require line-item transparency on $20M, and independent cybersecurity audit
Gail Legrander District 2 resident Civic trauma and voter suppression; noted only 26.66% turnout in July primaries; demanded accountability from Recorder Heap; warned about MAGA conspiracies harming elections
Patricia Lerner Arizona Mad Mom Daughter with severe mental illness; court-ordered treatment allowed to lapse twice; discovered renewal process has no funding source; asked board to review court-ordered treatment renewal funding
Andrew Tai Residential real estate (44 years) Foreclosure auction fraud; challenged board to review unclaimed funds from foreclosure sales; raised Flock surveillance Fourth Amendment concerns; mentioned explicit books in county libraries
Lauri Baroni (Frequent public commenter) Flock/ALPR cameras; noted contract allows cancellation but cameras remain; questioned $20M for Recorder’s parallel IT department; criticized $126.7M on consent agenda including $29.6M Northern Parkway, $11.7M EV charging, $140K plane maintenance
Roger Pickrell Vietnam veteran Voter integrity; advocated for one-day/paper ballot voting; wanted signature verification posters restored at polling places
Diane Pickerel (Roger Pickrell’s wife) Election procedures; supported in-person signature verification at polls; criticized early voting duration (28 days) as wasteful; claimed board cost taxpayers $20 million by not returning Heap’s equipment
David Escobar 16-year-old first-generation student Youth perspective on democracy; demanded transparency on Recorder Heap’s $20 million budget; raised ICE presence at polling places as intimidation concern

Note: The Clerk called 15 speaker slots but not all individuals were present when called. Speakers were called in groups of three.

Thematic Summary of Public Comment

Election/Oversight Theme (8 of 12 speakers):

  • Recorder Justin Heap’s $20 million budget and lack of transparency
  • Need for accessible voting (drive-through drop boxes)
  • Opposition to armed law enforcement at polling places
  • Demand for signature verification process improvements
  • Concerns about ICE intimidation affecting voter turnout
  • Low primary turnout (26.66%) as civic trauma indicator

Mental Health Theme (3 speakers):

  • Crystal Fox: systemic failures leading to familial homicide; multiple provider failures
  • Twyla Lake: request for board collaboration on jail mental health treatment
  • Patricia Lerner: court-ordered treatment renewal has no funding source

Data Centers/Growth Theme (1 speaker):

  • Lisa Everett: urged fact-based approach to data center impacts; shared Pinal County expert presentation

Financial Accountability Theme (2 speakers):

  • Andrew Tai: foreclosure auction fraud draining homeowner equity
  • Lauri Baroni: $126.7M on consent agenda hides spending from public scrutiny

Voting Process Theme (2 speakers):

  • Roger and Diane Pickrell: one-day voting, paper ballots, signature verification at polls

Pattern Observations

1. The Accountability Theater

Citizens delivered detailed, specific criticisms of RICO spending—with dollar amounts, timelines, and specific failures (4-year body cam backlog, $140K airplane maintenance). The board listened, expressed sympathy, then approved the spending authority unanimously without amendment. This creates the appearance of public engagement while ensuring zero impact on outcomes.

2. Lesko’s Motion Monopoly

100% motion control across multiple meetings is not distributed leadership. It’s a procedural chokepoint. When one supervisor makes every motion, the agenda’s framing is controlled by a single perspective.

3. Gallardo’s Silence After Arrival

Supervisor Gallardo arrived late but participated in all votes. He asked no questions during the RICO discussion and made no motions. After his forceful dissent on July 14 (emergency meeting on Recorder Heap), his silence on related topics today is notable.

4. The $20 Million Frame

Multiple citizens referenced the $20 million reallocated to Recorder Heap’s office. Diane Pickerel claimed the board “took $20 million out of the taxpayer’s pocketbook” by not returning equipment. David Escobar demanded “clear information about where it is going.” The board neither confirmed nor corrected this framing during public comment.

With 173 items, most actions passed on consent with zero discussion. This includes pharmaceutical donations for Correctional Health, EV infrastructure agreements, and ARPA reallocations. The volume makes meaningful review by board members or public effectively impossible.

6. The Mental Health Crisis in Public Comment

Three of the twelve speakers (Fox, Lake, Lerner) addressed serious mental illness system failures. Crystal Fox’s testimony was particularly harrowing: her son, after being denied care by multiple providers, killed his father. The board offered no response, no referral, no commitment to review. The disconnect between citizen pain and board action is stark.


Follow-Up Questions

  1. Why did the board approve RICO expenditure authority without addressing the specific spending concerns raised by citizens?
  2. Will the County Attorney’s office implement the public records process improvements suggested by speakers (better hyperlinks, timely reporting)?
  3. What is the status of the body camera redaction backlog, and why was only 4 FTE requested in the January 2026 budget?
  4. Did the board consider the mental health care gaps raised by Crystal Fox, Twyla Lake, and Patricia Lerner, and are there agenda items addressing systemic failures?
  5. What is the accurate framing of the Recorder’s $20 million—reallocation, new funding, or equipment return?
  6. Will the board respond in writing to the citizen concerns raised about election transparency and ICE presence at polling places?
  7. Will the board meet with Arizona Mad Moms as requested by Twyla Lake to discuss jail mental health treatment and homeless outreach?
  8. What is the County’s response to Andrew Tai’s allegations of foreclosure auction fraud?
  9. Is there a plan to address the “civic trauma” of low voter turnout that Gail Legrander raised?